Blah-blah-blah about the relationship
"Last night in New York," looked at the insistence of a few LJ friends to do.
movie is interesting, (I said that I love movies about relationships), but very simple as ABC. It is about how people who can not easily let go of the past can not construct a future. Tries, of course, but it now because of the past is very vague and ghostly. Movie about power and banality of the phrase "I love you" - as a human being even without batting an eye can cover their weaknesses, doubts and actions by these simple and powerful words. Characters of the film that is constantly engaged. How to simply say "I love you" and no longer deal that actually feels to a person or why you do not feel anything ... Why? These words - Bailout straws for lost and insecure. How easy say "I love you", see the expressive eyes, kiss her and wait until the blue in the face while stunned people take responsibility for you have just uttered the words, and make a reciprocal step. That came Alex. Said that he loved. And then what? In addition to a passionate kiss and attempt to drag were in bed, he does not do anything intelligible. he missed. He is curious. He does not care that she was married, he stalks her, with the addition "I love you", he had nothing to say. That's what for you come then? "Apparently this series," I dreamed you "or whatever it is: Helen and Paris are far from decided visit Joan, as she lives on without me? Forgotten or not? I will go and say hello, tickle yourself (and her at the same time) nerves. Ah ... it did not make a reciprocal step. Well ... Yes, and another friend of mine told me that all these years with her husband - they can not be scraped out of her mind, I immediately believed him, of course. Admit it, and most importantly to himself: "I attracted to you, yes, but still I did not ready to give you, because here I am, a freelance writer "- it must have a strong eggs. Much easier to meaningfully silent, still holding a man. I so want to place Joan asked: Alex Che you want from me? Why are you here? We can be together? And Joan? "And you, Alex, I love my husband and I love ... but we can not be together because I'm married. And yes, we broke up because of distance. "Moved, apparently, was in any way, especially in that both - not the poor writers and freelancers. I think that Joan left him, because this sugary smile her nothing guaranteed, and the distance - This is just an excuse. The situation between a husband and wife both have hinted about the divorce, but about him and no one thinks, of course, because in the movie outlines situation problematic comfort zone. Michael and Joan well to each other are, but they can not admit that their three-year marriage has outlived her, it's time to understand a problem or admit that they do not fit together. But as so often - it is easier to pretend that all is well. Divorce - a bunch of zamorochek. Much easier pretend that nothing happened and move on. There are obvious - the fatigue of relationships, unwillingness to listen to each other and yet: "I love you, oh how I love you "- and hiding in the queue for this life-saving curtain. Because of this "love" - solid omissions. Rather than tell his wife that he obsessed with sexual fantasies (and go by the handle to a psychologist), Michael pretends that everything is OK, that is between them was merely a quarrel. Yes, they both pretend jealousy - is a common marital conflicts. Meanwhile, Joan recalls the former, which did not work, my husband is not trusted. And for the film seems to me that Joan boring, despite polubogemnoe society. Therefore, when the background of mistrust of her husband, and this universal boredom appears the former, with whom she just does not get it so quickly dresses and light-footed sent to the meeting. Marriage is both needed for show, they either do not know how, or do not want to glue cracks, but at the same time, of course, much easier to live together than separately. Joan married because Alex - Dunce, and Michael - a good guy, they are together a long time and, as required by formal instruction "wife", now keeps a formal allegiance to her husband, though suffering. But Michael? He said very true words: "I am happily married. Very. But the temptation is not saved, "which completely defines its attitude towards marriage, to his wife, and sex. And they are individually but not together, trying to solve their problems and dangerous experiment with their feelings. The translation was awful, but the faces of the actors can all understand that a film about the weak people who pretend to be strong, who do not know what they want. Which is boring and they are looking for some new experiences, while using other people closest to instead ask yourself: what I want? Instead, there is a typical a game of cat and mouse - "Guess what I have in mind, although I do not know myself, and I, each time seeing it from the side, puzzled: why people behave in a similar scenario? Why? Why is everyone so hard, when a decision - on the surface? Why is it so scary to change something? "That's what me and interesting film - it is about how often happens in life. And he just did not give any solutions because the solution depends on the people themselves, in this case - the weak-willed, confused and tired.
way, This is the first film in which I do not like Keira Knightley. More precisely, her smile. Kind of forbidding it, although I have always adored the actress.
0 comments:
Post a Comment